The Threat Of A Foreign Flag Complete Information?

Just learned that there is Navy-wide coming Mon March 22 and Tues 23 March in the course of which, are currently planned, the U.S. military bases / teams will be at the level of "Charlie" (C) level of safety on Monday, and then in DELTA (D) level of security, on Tuesday, March 23. As far as I know, the last time we were on the "Delta" was the day of 9 / 11, and then decreases not too long after 9 / 11 at Charlie.
 
I understand that the safety of the base corresponds DEFCON levels, and that Delta is very high. There is something strange about the lack of a general alert personnel at the base, where I work, the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) in Monterey, California, on this exercise, as I said that and other naval bases in our Navy Region SW warned their staff to this work as much as months ago, and that the fleet instructions / provide for every reason to do the same, but has not yet been all hands on nuclear alert, and I was also told that someone said they did not understand why there is all the "mysteries" surrounding the coming exercisefor submarines, and not elsewhere.

read more

False Flag Cyber Attack

False Flag Cyber Attack :Limit and monitor Internet access was extended on behalf of the Pentagon and other government agencies in the light of recent threats. The media are increasingly covering the threat "electronic Pearl Harbor" that could be conducted online. If the U.S. were attacked online, it can affect the banking, energy systems, railways and water sources, leaving the country in a state that would make it difficult to defend.

Nevertheless, many of these requirements were more exaggerated.By Evgency Morozov, researcher and blogger, who writes on the threats and political developments on the Internet, sometimes the threat associated with government agencies and cyber-security companies, which create a false hype around this issue. It is these institutions and companies that are likely to apply in case of attack, and they are trying to attract business for themselves.

read more

False Flag Cyber Attack 2010

Increased noise limit and control the Internet on behalf of the government, the Pentagon, the intelligence community and the private corporate weapons would pose a cyber-attack is used as an excuse.  In recent months we have witnessed a significant increase in reporting inflated fears of a possible "electronic Pearl Harbor" that the reports claiming that the U.S. could be "cut-down within 15 minutes."  Much-hyped (and in some cases completely asinine) argues that power and other key infrastructure such as rail networks and water sources are connected to the Internet have penetrated such coverage.
The threats against computer networks in the United States are greatly exaggerated. Dire reports prepared by the Defense Science Board and the Center for Strategic and International Studies, as a rule, richer in vivid metaphor - with fears of "digital Pearl Harbors" and "cyber-Katrinas - than in the factual basis," says Evgeny Morozov, a respected researcher and blogger, who wrote about the political implications of the Internet.  Morozov said that most of the data on the alleged cyber-threats "came the ultra-secretive government agencies which have to justify its existence - and cyber-security firms - which derive commercial benefits from the popular concern."  When cyber law was introduced by Senator John Rockefeller, the last year, he made similar statements about the threat of cyber-attacks, adding: "Would it be better if we had never invented the Internet?".
Rockefeller legislation gives the president an opportunity to "declare cyber security emergency" and to close or restrict the Internet traffic in a "critical" information network "in the interests of national security." the bill does not define the critical information network and cyber security emergency. This definition will be left to the discretion of the president, according to the report, Mother Jones.
The provisions of the bill would allow the federal government, according to DHS and the NSA, to connect to any aspect of digital information every citizen without a warrant. Banks, business and medical records will be open for inspection, as well as personal instant messages and e-mail - all in the name to go cyber-attacks on the state.
Accessories such provisions are contained in the latest "cyber-security as a national heritage law, which persistently Senator Joe Lieberman. The bill hands the absolute power of the federal government to close the network, and block incoming Internet traffic from certain countries under the declared state of emergency.
Accompanying the grid control cybersecurity will only create a greater risk in the opinion of experts, who note that it essentially "set the path for the bad guys to go down." Other countries such as Australia and the UK, followed suit.
The program is coordinated with the Pentagon's newly created Cyber Command, headed by Keith B Alexander, Acting Chief, National Security Agency and the man behind the massive program of illegal dragnet surveillance of domestic communications since at least 2001.
In the Senate Armed Services Committee confirmation hearing, Alexander said the Pentagon's Cyber Command will use the "significant interaction" with the NSA. "We have to show that we do, that we behave, obey the laws," said Alexander, claiming perversely agency respect and protect the privacy of the American people.
The Pentagon believes cyberspace is a domain of military land, sea, air and space. In 2003, the Pentagon classified the Internet as an enemy "weapon system", requiring "reliable offensive set of features includes a full range of electronic and computer network attack." They spent billions of dollars building a super secret "National Cyber Range" in order to prepare for "Dominant Cyber Offensive Engagement", which translates to control over any "computers. The program is called "electronic Manhattan Project".
The enemy is never specifically named, it is only one who uses the Internet, because the enemy in the network. The enemy of freedom net provides billions around the world and the threat of militaristic domination of information and ultimately the power that gives.
These initiatives represent a continuation of the so-called "comprehensive national cybersecurity initiative" created with the help of secret presidential decree in 2008 under the Bush administration. Former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell said that the NSA wiretaps unauthorized will be "a walk in the park compared to this."
"This will be a goat rope on the mountain" McConnell said. My prediction is that we'll fuck with it until something terrible happens. "
As we have previously reported, large corporations, such as Google, AT & T, Facebook and Yahoo to name but a few of them are deeply involved in the overall program. These corporations have specific weapons to the Government, which supplies software, hardware and technical support for U.S. intelligence agencies in the process of creating a huge database of open source for the global spy network to exchange information.

Obviously, the impact of this program for the open and free internet access, and freedom in general are very concerned, as reflected in the resistance and criticism from groups such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
In light of this, there is a real danger of inflated or fully staged cyber attack is distributed in order to bring the matter to the attention of the public and combat critics who have identified it as part of the agenda to restrict Internet access.
In 2008, Stanford Law professor Lawrence Lessig details of the current government's plans to overhaul and limitations.
 
Lessig told participants of a high-profile technology conference that "There is going to be i-9/11 event, which will act as a catalyst for radical treatment of law relating to the Internet.
Lessig said that he came to this conclusion after a conversation with the former Government counter-terrorism tsar Richard Clarke, who told him that there already exists a cyber equivalent of the Patriot Act, "" I-Patriot Act ", if you want, and that the Ministry of Justice simply waiting for the event terrorism, cyber to implement its provisions.
Lessig is the founder of the Center of Stanford Law School Internet and Society. He is a founder member of the board of the Foundation and board member of the Software Freedom Law Center. He is known as an advocate of reducing the legal restrictions on copyright, trademark and radio frequency spectrum, in particular in application technology.
This is clearly not some paranoid delusion cyber computers.
Although Richard Clarke supporters to strengthen cybersecurity, and he said that it would be a terrible idea to allow the government to regulate and filter the Internet.
We have also recently seen numerous mock attacks conducted by the Government, with the help of private outsourcing of its own systems infrastructure. In such an event, entitled "We've been warned: Cyber Shockwave", involved the former Department of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, a former deputy CIA director John McLaughlin, taking the role of government leaders.

read more

Andrew Breitbart And Shirley Sherrod Videos Watch Online

Andrew Breitbart, whose placement video USDA official Shirley Sherrod has caused controversy and confusion in the NAACP and the Obama administration, was on Hannity to get their views across. There is the number of take-away from this interview.

First, Breitbart was just a snippet of the video he released on the Big Government, not the full video with the context of reception Sherrod about racism. Secondly, Breitbart States, with some justification, that the NAACP and Obama White House brought this on themselves with accusations of racism against the Tea Party.

Breitbart even quotes Marian Frances Berry on a strategy designed to make the Tea Party, to defend themselves and purge their ranks. Sadly, that does not seem to compassion Sherrod, few, if not entirely innocent victim in this fight. Mind, NAACP and the administration of USA

read more

Andrew Breitbart Libel Shirley Sherrod Brietbart Could Be Threatened

Andrew Breitbart Libel Shirley Sherrod Brietbart Could Be Threatened:Comic Con taking a break to see what else is happening: Google Trends shows the ugly story of what happened previously unknown Shirley Sherrod.

Conservative blogger Andrew hit Breitbart known for his extreme approach of attacking liberals, but what he did to Shirley Sherrod, a government worker who spoke at the NAACP 24 years ago and that he apparently made a new video claims it is racist , went too far.

While he said that he intended to harm the NAACP, he took Shirley Sherrod do it. She did not ask about it.

Andrew Breitbart may be a target for the U.S. Department of Justice Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, which is in criminal cases. The website, which was sent this blogger Ministry of Justice on the other issues cover a variety of crimes related to the computer.

If Breitbart changed the video Shirley Sherrod, to make it look like she made a statement which he then called a racist, he is certainly guilty of defamation against Shirley Sherrod.

read more

Wireless Broadband Network For Launch Next Year

Wireless Broadband Network For Launch Next Year: New York:American consumers and businesses can get more choices in wireless service, starting next year with the launch of a new wireless broadband network, which aims at ensuring competition existing telephone companies.

Private Investment Company, Harbinger Capital Partners on Tuesday revealed details of the launch of its wireless network, LightSquared, which should cover 92 percent of the population by 2015.

But there are financial and regulatory barriers to overcome. And in another wrinkle, LightSquared will not initially offer regular services to mobile phone, just data. You can send phone calls over data connection, but the technology is not fully mature or standardized.

read more

Shirley Sherrod: Racist Or Scapegoat Information?

If the Administration and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, are too quickly and their reaction to Shirley Sherrod, the Department of Agriculture employee who has resigned (ie, fired) for alleged racist remarks?

The video clip posted on the Internet shows Sherrod Monday, speaking at a banquet March NAACP, where she talks about her failure to help white farmer who was on the verge of losing his farm. Her advice: If he was black, she would have moved heaven and earth to help him.

"There is zero tolerance for discrimination at USDA, and I strongly condemn all acts of discrimination against any person," said Minister of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, has accepted the resignation of Sherrod. NAACP, which last week accused of racism Tea Party, ran searing condemnation of Sherrod: "We are shocked by her actions, as we have with abuse of power against farmers of color and women farmers," said NAACP President Benjamin Jealous.

read more

Opinion: The truth About Shirley Sherrod, Big Government And The National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People

Shirley Sherrod was a video showing a clip of racism within the federal government? Not hard if you know the whole story. Big Government and the NAACP-got it wrong.
Given the recent controversy around the Tea Party and the NAACP charges of racism in its elements, it's not surprising that supporters of both factions are looking long and hard to find evidence that a bank who is calling the kettle black. And Andrew Breitbart thought that he found it in Shirley Sherrod. But, as expected in political life, this whole story was not told.


Big Breitbart to the government website YouTube video shows Sherrod, now former director of USDA Rural Development in Georgia, speaking at the NAACP Freedom Fund Dinner March, telling the story of how she did not fully help the white farmer when he turned help preserve their farm. Sherrod further states that she believes the farmer talked as if he were above it, and that Sherrod had decided not to give him "full force" in her care, thinking that the new bankruptcy laws and took him to a white lawyer would end up save it in any way.

He eventually get help "their own kind."
Storm follows. Cries of double standards are sent via the Internet, and blogospheres Twitterverse. As can be called a racist NAACP to another organization, when they are against racism within their own, especially when it comes to the federal official appointed?

read more