In one corner you have Twilighters lining up outside theaters across the country to be among the first to see the latest romantic adventures of saturated starring Robert Pattinson, Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner. Those fans line again and again before the weekend is over, probably something "Eclipse" catch the opening of tickets for the match if not exceed, 142,8 million dollars, that "New Moon" has earned in November. In another corner, you have the skeptics, who-watch-this shit-haters and bloggers taking on the Web spew vitriol at any time adolescents novel "Eclipse" has to offer.
There will be no relaxation for these two camps, the gap between them as irresistible as anything in pop culture, the prevailing today. Critics on both sides of the divide Twoey weighs in on the third installment of the vampire franchise, and MTV News checks that some of them had to say.
Owen Gleiberman in Entertainment Weekly does a great job trying to get fans and haters, to eye to eye. "'Twilight Movies, like books in which they are based, are often abused," he wrote. "But this is only because we are still somewhat getting used to the newness of most modern blockbuster saga that is rooted in this in the old-fashioned, frontier girl masochistic romantic delight. Adaptations' Eclipse ", with its dueling boy-monster pieces - a chaste orgy men looking - relishes the power that Bell's experience, giving himself to the impotence of love. A movie about a straight girl's dream to be desired. It may be trite, but it is also a necessary antidote to Summer cinema equipment.
Of course, not all reviews are generous about what they see as the shortcomings of the rich film. Take MTV News Kurt Loder own: "The new director David Slade is still stuck in history - that, getting as it comes with paceless goop books by Stephenie Meyer, and being wrestled to the script Melissa Rosenberg, a worn blanket pre-adolescent romantic cliches of a soft too long memories of the character and incoherent dialogue that deader than any of those present vampires, "said Lauder. (Photography is two hours, and it would be more enjoyable - and, of course, less annoying - if it had been reduced by 1 hour TV special.)
Salon.com 's Andrew O'Hehir approached the movie with an open heart and found the fans the pleasure of being on the screen was up. "It's geek-friendly genre film, with plenty of CGI effects and fight sequences, as well as advanced traffic diversions in the back stories of undead in rural Washington and shape shifter of the population, as well as the tensions between them," he suggested. "Melissa Rosenberg, the script, even a few flashes comedy, and develops emotional strength that goes far beyond depressed, in love with longing" New Moon. "
What speeches castmembers? Opinion is expected to be split, with some slamming three large and others applauded the young actors for giving maximum effort yet in this series.
"There is a new softness and sweetness that Stewart brings to her relationships - more playful with Pattinson and more affectionate with [Billy] Burke (especially when Charlie is trying to have" sex talk "), and more intense with Lautner," says Betsy Sharkey in Los Angeles Times. "Bella did not want to take anyone, and Stewart is sure that she does not. But it Lautner, in particular, who grew up, letting James emotionally interior is almost as rammed as ABS, which are very much on the screen."
We will give the final word to one of the true fans of the movie. "Of course, the book itself is a fan favorite," the reviewer wrote about TwilightMoms.com. "How is the visual counterpart, not only for entertainment, with a foot device tent stage, and all the grandiose displays the most incredible vampire and werewolf skills?" I must say, however, that it is not only the scenes that blew me it was a movie whole. Callens cold, wolves wolfier and acting supreme. This visual experience is not just a lover of cure is a full dessert chance "Twilight movie is good. And you'll leave feeling like you just partied "
